>In a message dated 4/30/2004 10:57:18 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>dhenwood at panix.com writes:
>
>And what about Kucinich? He was in all the Dem debates, and got a
>chance to air his views. Why couldn't he get more than 1-2% of the
>primary vote - the Democratic primary, where voters are to the left
>of the general election? It's easy to blame money or the media, but
>the problem is more complex than that.
>
>Doug
>
>Because progressives refused to back him up.
Howzzat? Would a series of editorials in The Nation added a few percentage points to his vote? That sounds like John Halle's delusional claims.
Doug