>Howzzat? Would a series of editorials in The Nation added a few percentage
>points to his vote? That sounds like John Halle's delusional claims.
>
>Doug
Gore lost because of Gore, but Nader came in at 2.74% because of...well, anything but Nader.
FRank Scott wrote:
>"John Anderson pulled in 3% of the black vote in 1980. Who was around
>forthat race? Did he have a big war chest?"
>
>plenty, compared to the real alternative candidate...
The question was: compared to Nader, did Anderson have a bigger war chest.
Anyone around at the time that could give us decent numbers?
>he was part of the
>debates, was officially dubbed "reasonable", and barry commoner was the
>left-out leftist of that time...
really? although I wasn't able to vote yet, I remember hearing about Commoner in my yoot.
Kelley