Joanna
Doug Henwood wrote:
> [I think this is for real, but you never know. Thanks to Michael Pug
> (of course) for pointing it out.]
>
> <http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/wim/cong/languagetheory2004.html>
>
>
> Maoist Internationalist Movement
>
> Resolutions on Writing in Context
>
> Over more than a decade there has been whining in the party on writing
> in context, because the rules of writing are not simple or even stated
> as if they could be for all contexts. Past oversimplified proposals
> included only using the term "settler" to refer to whites. This past
> year there have been tussles over "bitch" and "Amerikkkan." A past
> congress resolution specifically eliminated "cracker," but did not
> step up to a general theory of language and enemies. This resolution
> is meant as the general theory behind writing in context and making
> our terminology correspond to that context--subordinating form to
> content.
>