[lbo-talk] "Clash of Civilizations, or Capital Accumulation?" by Jonathan Nitzan and Shimshon Bichler
Michael Pollak
mpollak at panix.com
Sat Aug 7 05:36:59 PDT 2004
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Doug Henwood wrote:
>> 5. Global dominant capital is rather happy to see inflation in the offing.
>
> I think Nitazn & Bichler are right about oil prices, but "dominant capital"
> isn't necessarily happy about it.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, the only things Nitzan and Bichler are right
about are the things no one ever questioned. Propositions 1-3, that the
war would drive up oil prices, were subscribed to by everyone who thought
invading Iraq would lead to chaos in one form or another, which is just
about the entire anti-war movement from Chirac to Chuck0. Their only
original contribution seems to be in propositions 4 and 5 -- that
inflation has been unleashed and that capital is happy about it -- and on
the face of it both those propositions seem diametrically wrong: there is
no serious inflation threat anywhere and yet the markets are already
terrified even at the thought of it. Europe has arguably been paralyzed
by this fear -- it might have just snuffed out an incipient recovery by
convincing them to keep the monetary choker pulled tight. Instead of
inflation, higher oil prices seem to have led to slower growth, which
contradicts the last of their points, that they would be good for
accumulation.
Am I missing something?
Michael
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list