[lbo-talk] The Importance of Disenfranchising Nader/Camejo Voters

SergioL652 at aol.com SergioL652 at aol.com
Mon Aug 16 14:52:53 PDT 2004


In a message dated 8/16/2004 10:05:48 AM Eastern Standard Time, nathanne at nathannewman.org writes:

Yes, it is a sign that minorities have power in the Democratic Party that it fights for expanded rights for those minorities. How is it a fall from anywhere that the Dems continue to fight to expand civil rights?

What in your mind would be a sign of such concession?

Nathan

So your point is that Kerry supporting civil rights is a concession to minorities in the party. I guess that means that without minority pressure, Kerry would not support civil rights. It is not in the nature of the DP to support civil rights, it has to be pressured into it.

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20040816/db0825fd/attachment.htm>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list