[lbo-talk] The Importance of Disenfranchising Nader/Camejo Voters

Nathan Newman nathanne at nathannewman.org
Mon Aug 16 15:10:03 PDT 2004


----- Original Message ----- From: SergioL652 at aol.com
>So your point is that Kerry supporting civil rights is a concession to
>minorities in the party. I guess that means that without minority
>pressure, Kerry would not support civil rights. It is not in the nature
>of the DP to support civil rights, it has to be pressured into it.

My original point is that "the Democratic Party" is not some uber-ideological construct, so "it" is nothing until activists apply pressure by voting in the primaries. It's a coalition of political viewpoints. And the presence of civil rights activists means that only politicians like Kerry, who support civil rights laws, get the nomination for the party.

And the GOP, which once represented some civil rights activists, no longer does, so there are few pro-civil rights politicians within it.

What is shocking about that statement? Parties go where there voters want them to. Subtract the voters and their pressure, subtract the policies.

Nathan Newman



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list