>But that is daydreaming. A movement demand for such an international
>force is _exactly_ the same as a movement demand that the U.S. stay
>there but be nicer and repair the damage it has done.
>
>Hence I repeat my original point. I wish some of those who argue that
>"Out Now!" is "too simplistic" could give some reason to believe that
>there is any possibility whatever of the U.S. occupation remedying _any_
>of the evil it has created. Your language may make you feel better about
>yourself, but it is of no help to the Iraqi who are going to die
>because the anti-war movement in the u.s. prefers nice words to reality.
>
>> No one I feel any fellowship for feels the U.S. should stay and
>> "finish the job."
>
>I know someone. Doug Henwood. The position you express above has the
>same material content as demanding that the U.S. should stay and finish
>the job.
>
>I have never misinterpreted your stand on Iraq. You consistently
>misinterpret your own stand on Iraq.
Go fuck yourself, Carrol.