> -----Original Message-----
> From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
> On Behalf Of Doug Henwood
> Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 3:43 PM
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] The Occupation, was [Fwd: Fw: Why the torture
> atAbu Ghraib...
>
> Carrol Cox wrote:
>
> >But that is daydreaming. A movement demand for such an international
> >force is _exactly_ the same as a movement demand that the U.S. stay
> >there but be nicer and repair the damage it has done.
> >
> >Hence I repeat my original point. I wish some of those who argue that
> >"Out Now!" is "too simplistic" could give some reason to believe that
> >there is any possibility whatever of the U.S. occupation remedying _any_
> >of the evil it has created. Your language may make you feel better about
> >yourself, but it is of no help to the Iraqi who are going to die
> >because the anti-war movement in the u.s. prefers nice words to reality.
> >
> >> No one I feel any fellowship for feels the U.S. should stay and
> >> "finish the job."
> >
> >I know someone. Doug Henwood. The position you express above has the
> >same material content as demanding that the U.S. should stay and finish
> >the job.
> >
> >I have never misinterpreted your stand on Iraq. You consistently
> >misinterpret your own stand on Iraq.
>
> Go fuck yourself, Carrol.
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk