[lbo-talk] plagiarism watch

[Michael Dawson]

Bunk.  I didn't claim to be posting a complete theory of property.  I was
simply pointing out that not all property is stolen.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
> On Behalf Of Eubulides
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 1:17 PM
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] plagiarism watch
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Dawson" <MDawson at pdx.edu>
> 
> 
> > Intellectual property is theft.
> >
> > Chuck
> 
> Tell that to Little Richard, who never got a nickel from Pat Boone, who
> stole his songs outright before copyright was extended to music.
> 
> If it's created by the labor of its owner, property is not theft.
> 
> -----
> 
> Naive Lockeanism.
> 
> By that short assertion, Einstein and his heirs should own the stream/flow
> of exchange value of the STR, the GTR and lots of other 'stuff.'
> 
> And why *shouldn't* he? What makes his creativity different from that of
> Little Richard, or Picasso?
> 
> 
> 
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk