[lbo-talk] RE: Theory of Porn

kelley at pulpculture.org kelley at pulpculture.org
Thu Feb 5 08:42:20 PST 2004


At 11:10 AM 2/5/2004, Diane Monaco wrote:
>Barbie <kelley at pulpculture.org> wrote:
>
>(and i'd still like to get on this thing about how men always and forever
>need visual representation -- apparently more so than women-- to get turned
>on. oooooh ken, vrooom vrooom. wanna go for a ride in the 'vette? oh gosh,
>where ARE my keys!?
>
>Please forgive me. I'll do all your laundry for the next six months
>including hand washing all your disco dresses.

LOL skipper. you gotta deal! this way, i'll have more time for ken. ken is such a doll. he's the BEST boyfriend every.

wanna know why? coz, when we're done, i can put him back in his box.


>Your obliged and devoted little sister,
>Skipper

anyone remember the name of skipper's boyfriend?

Gilligan!

Sorry, i HAD to do it. The reason why Ken and I became good chums goes back years to this very joke! I was accused of being a Barbie to Ken's Ken. In retort, I decided to BE Barbie. which was actually quite liberating. long story, that.

when I ask Ken if he wants to go for a ride, it's usually a loving reference to the fact that Ken and I argue like cats and dogs and have a well-known history for doing so on this list, much to Doug's chagrin. Ken and I helped each other write the diss and study for exams by abusing the 3 post limit, severely!

going for a ride is also a reference to a lacanian reading of me as neurotic (insisting on trying to be heard by ken) and ken as a narcissist (or was it psychotic?) (ken keeps saying "i can't hear you" which drowns out my neurotic repetition)

do i have that right ken?

anyway, in spite of all that, if anyone dares go after ken, i'll take 'em to the mat. when i'm done, i'll polish my nails and go back to being a pain in ken's ass.

smoochiez!

K



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list