>I would say Shane point is quite simple - something alone the lines
>of 'first, do no harm'. Why should ABB's cite the rail against the
>proscription of civil liberties only to threaten violence or tacitly
>approve violence against people (like Nader) exercising their
>constitutional rights to political action. The position that it is
>wrong for Nader to run because we all have to rally around Kerry is
>a political opinion that can be respected only as far as it also
>respect the right of people to articulate the position that it is
>more important to run a Third Party campaign. Indeed, Nader
>supporters have been physically attacked, and the glib attitude that
>ABBs have towards this mean-spiritedness in their ranks is scary.
Let me go on the record as saying that no one should injure or threaten to injure Ralph Nader and anyone who does either should be arrested. Ok?
Doug