>doug, i'm wondering what you think of the contention by Nader, as he
>put it today on Dem.now to A. goodman, that he's basically running to
>keep the fire on the dem candidate(s) kerry/edwards (presuming edwards
>gets the vp slot). it seems that his candidacy, if you can call it
>that, is not really geared to winning lots of votes as opposed to
>simply keeping the heat on Kerry to not move to the right over the
>campaign.
How does he keep the heat up except by getting votes? He's coming up with as many reasons for his candidacy as W did for invading Iraq.
Doug