[lbo-talk] Re: Blind, or a coward / antisemitism?

[Joseph Wanzala]

give me a f____ing break Mr. Berlet. No I don't see the antisemitic 
conspirecy theory lurking about here but I do see you lurking about with 
your silly 'anti-semitic conspiracy theory' distortions. Israel is a real 
place with a role in geopolitics like any other country. To discuss it is 
not anti-semitic and being critical of Israel should not be (though it 
frequently is) confused with anti-semitism. If that is the case then the 
Israeli press, which is as candid about Israel as any other, is 
'anti-semitic' how silly can you get!@**$%^!&#_#_@!#)!@#@!+@)$@!$#!!!!!!!


>From: "Chip Berlet" <cberlet at igc.org>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
>Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] Re: Blind, or a coward / antisemitism?
>Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:34:20 -0400
>
>Hi,
>
>OK, Wanzala. Is your next post a pointer the the Protocols of the Elders
>of Zion?  Can you see the antisemitic conspiracy theory lurking about
>here?
>
>Chip Berlet
>Senior Analyst
>Political Research Associates
>Webmaster
>http://www.publiceye.org
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joseph Wanzala [mailto:jwanzala at hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 2:27 PM
> > To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> > Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Re: Blind, or a coward
> >
> >
> > from xymphora:
> >
> > Thursday, July 01, 2004
> >
> > Bob Dreyfuss wonders how Michael Moore could get the entire
> > blame for 9-11
> > so back-asswards, throwing it all on the obviously innocent
> > Saudis and
> > ignoring completely the Israelis. Michael Moore is a big-time
> > Hollywood film
> > director. You need money - lots of it - to make big-time
> > Hollywood films.
> > The people who produce, finance, and distribute big-time
> > Hollywood films,
> > and in particular this one, and any other that Moore would
> > like to make, are
> > not going to finance a film that lays any blame for anything
> > on Israel. It's
> > a, um, tribal thing. Moore knows that his American audience has a
> > psychological need for a foreign villain to help deal with
> > the guilt that
> > America itself was primarily responsible for 9-11, and the
> > connections of
> > the Bush Crime Family to the Saudi elites allows him to have
> > his villain and
> > attack Bush at the same time. This would be completely
> > harmless American
> > jingoism except that I guarantee that if Bush gets reelected
> > the neocons
> > will be citing Moore's film and claiming that even the most
> > liberal of all
> > liberals supports their ultimate fantasy, the bombing of
> > Mecca. __________________
> >
> > http://www.tompaine.com/articles/blind_or_a_coward.php
> >
> > Blind, Or A Coward?
> > June 30, 2004
> >
> >
> > One of the first things I did when I got back from vacation
> > was to go see
> > Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. It's a brilliant piece of
> > propaganda,
> > entertaining and funny, and it skewers the president
> > deliciously. But am I
> > the only one to notice that in one critically important way,
> > it entirely
>
><SNIP>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk