Darrin Kowitz wrote:
>
> I have one book, "Archetypal Explorations: Towards an
> Archetypal Sociology" by David Gray, which relates Jungian psychology to
> Marx, Durkheim, Mead, and the rest of the obligitory crowd. It's shallow,
> but good for a sufrace scratcher. Anyone else ever thought about this or
> have any input?
In literary scholarship, while I have often found Freudian criticism annoying, Jungian criticism (or Jungian-influenced criticism) is simply appalling: something like eating a chocalate cake with ex-lax as the chocalate. Jungian interpretations of Paradise Lost are unbelievably grotesque.
Carrol