Joe W.
http://www.democracynow.org/ Headlines July 27, 2004 - Appeal on DNC 'Free Speech Zone' Denied - Islamic Charity Accuses FBI of Fabricating Evidence - SEIU Chief Says Kerry Loss Could Aid Unions & Dems - UN Envoy Says US War “Brought in Terrorism” to Iraq - FBI Agents Question Kansas & Colorado Activists - Poll: Delegates Disagree with Kerry on Issues
>From: John Lacny <jlacny at earthlink.net>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] "I don't know if (labor) would survive with
>aDemocratic Prez"
>Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:20:48 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
>
>Joseph Wanzala asks:
>
> > John, he *did* make the statement, to be sure it was a
> > subtle point but he did say what I referred to above on
> > Democracy Now! today and he is also quoted in USA
> > Today (why would Hoffa have denouced what he said if
> > he didn't say it?
>
>Why not actually read or listen to what he said? It's online
>(both articles and audio) at the Washington Post. In no way
>did he say that the labor movement would be "better off" if
>Kerry lost, which is what Joseph Wanzala (or whoever he
>quoted) claimed. That's not even a paraphrase -- it's a
>misrepresentation of what Stern said. Though it's par for the
>course for the media.
>
>There's a world of difference between saying that there's
>always a danger of labor leaders getting sucked into Kerry's
>machine once he's in power, and saying that a Kerry loss
>would leave labor "better off."
>
>I know this makes four posts for me today, but I wanted to
>clarify this. I think it's important to actually read/listen to
>what Stern said, instead of just parsing the headlines. What
>he said was pretty interesting, and I'm sure he'll be criticized
>for the timing, but I don't find anything to disagree with in it.
>
>
>
>- - - - -
>John Lacny
>http://www.johnlacny.com
>
>People of the US, unite and defeat the Bush regime and all its running
>dogs!
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk