[lbo-talk] Sexuality Under Seige or So What Else is New?

andie nachgeborenen andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 29 13:39:11 PDT 2004


It does include the right to sexual privacy -- see Griswold v. CT, the contraceptives case. That's why this is so wrong.

joanna bujes <jbujes at covad.net> wrote:Privacy doesn't include the right to sexual privacy? Wow.

Joanna

BklynMagus wrote:


>Dear List:
>
>Below is an article about the latest assault on sexual freedom.
>
>It is interesting that while LBO discusses whether one should say
>"dick" or "pussy," this ruling comes along.
>
>
>

___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20040729/932c23c7/attachment.htm>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list