[lbo-talk] Sexuality Under Seige or So What Else is New?

[andie nachgeborenen]

I hate to be a one note Johnny, but would you explain to me why contraceptives are constitutionally protected by the provacy rights under the due process clause, but vibrators are not? If we had a blank slate, no Griswold, no Roe, no cases granting praviacy rights in sexual matters, maybe you would be right, but we don't. The 11th Cir, flies in the face of clear and long established constitutional law.

Jordan Hayes <jmhayes at j-o-r-d-a-n.com> wrote:>> "I'm just very disappointed that courts feel Alabamians don't
>> have the right to purchase adult toys. It's just ludicrous,"
>> said Williams, who lives in Florida ...

I guess it doesn't sound to me like that's what the court said; they
seemed to imply that they thought the law was silly, but that striking
it down via a constitutional challenge wasn't gonna cut it. Which I
guess I'm okay with.

It's really the legislature that feels that Alabamians don't have the
right to purchase adult toys, right?

___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20040729/080834ca/attachment.htm>