Btw I can't agree with the person who evinced special alarm about having someone being treated for mood disorders with his finger on the button. That is not a problem by itself. In fact, it's good if the person with his finger on the button is seeking treatment if he feels he needs it. The job is impossibly stressful. It would drive anyone sentient crazy. (Which is why it didn'tseem to bother Reagan.) There are lots of Presidents we have had who were worrisome, self-medicated with alchohol, like Nixon, maybe a little nuts -- during Watergate the White House had to direct the SAC commanders to ignore any alarming orders coming from the President's Office.
Or Johnson and Kennedy, who suffered from testocerene poisoning, which is probbaly a lot worse than depression and side effects from ADs. ANd there is no treatment for it, other than having your ass kicked by feminists. Maybe a few good sessions with a proper Dominatrix might help, I dunno. In fact, the fact that Bush is seeking treatment si the single most encouraging thing I have heard abouyt him. Won't change my vote, though.
jks
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, John Thornton wrote:
> People taking AD's need to have someone monitor their
> behavior carefully. We still do not know enough about these drugs to treat
> them as cavalierly as we so often seem to do.
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20040730/e5faad25/attachment.htm>