[lbo-talk] Re: lost in translation...meaning?

[C. G. Estabrook]

You're quite right.  The most remarkable thing about the movie is that
someone managed to be put it about that it was good. The woman may one day
learn something about acting -- it's an open question -- but Murray, who
should know better, was in fact much better in Ethan Hawke's Hamlet. --CGE

On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, frank scott wrote:


> " I just watched about one-half hour of Lost in Translation and do not
> understand why this irritating, humdrum movie elicited such oohs and
> ahs. Why exactly is the viewer supposed to be interested in the mild
> world-weariness of the Bill Murray character, some clown who's earning
> two million bucks for doing a few minutes' modeling work?"
> 
>  an over-rated piece of crap, and what a relief to find someone else
> so underwhelmed by it...
> 
> fs
> 
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>