Nader Goes Buchananite (Re: [lbo-talk] Vote Nader/Camejo 2004!

[Joseph Wanzala]

Well it would be unfair if Bush got all the vitriol for himself, the 
Democrats deserve their fair share, especially as they do not only support 
Bush's war, but assiduously implemented the sanctions regime (structural 
violence - i.e. 'war') complete with the occasional bombing to keep things 
lively in Baghdad in between the all out Bush wars.

Joe W.


>From: "Joel Wendland" <joelrw at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: Re: Nader Goes Buchananite (Re: [lbo-talk] Vote Nader/Camejo 2004!
>Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:12:02 -0400
>
>This argument is puzzling. Naderites and supporters tend to reserve their 
>vitriol for Al Gore and John Kerry. I would agree that Bush and his war 
>should be the main target, so why isn't it? why isn't the removal of Bush 
>from office the number one objective?
>
>Joel Wendland
>
>
>Chuck0 wrote:
>
>>I'm sure that the Naderites and the Greens relish being attacked by 
>>Democrats. It's confirmation for their support of a Third Party. The 
>>Democrats are pretty fucked up if they reserve their vitriol for Ralph 
>>Nader instead of Bush and his war. Why aren't the Democrats fighting Bush 
>>more openly?
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>>From ‘will you?’ to ‘I do,’ MSN Life Events is your resource for Getting
>Married. http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=married
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk