>John's letter to Counterpunch makes him fair game for anyone who
>believes in the continuing struggle against u.s. crimes across the
>globe. And my focus here is not on either his arguments or my arguments
>but on whether he considers those who oppose support of the DP traitors.
>If he does, then he is a piece of shit. If he doesn't, and either I have
>misunderstood his letter to Counterpunch or he retracts it, then I owe
>him an apology.
>
>I stopped reading this post with the words copied above, because they
>show that he is not going to respond to my central point.
Sometimes I wonder why I put up with your presence. The only reason I can think of is because you're kind of funny, in a tragic way. But calling people pieces of shit, and announcing that you're not reading them while nonetheless lecturing them in your most annoying ex cathedra tone - that's just not acceptable human behavior. If the world you're trying to create is anything like your personality, then I don't want any part of it.
Doug