Why do you assume that it was a matter of anybody having 'fucked up' this is of course the 'incompetency' excuse that lets the Bush administration off the hook and obviates an inquiry. Any inquiry has to open ended as suggested in the article, again quoted below: "Could the attacks have been stopped" not "who fucked up" the incompetency theory gives Bush the cop out option of saying oh, shucks, we fucked up and absolves them from any accountability. If it is a matter of hving fucked up then why are they being so evasive, what kind of fucking up that does not indicate complicity or malice forethough could they be being so shifty about? Why are you so willing to give Bush & Co. the benefit of the doubt, especially at this stage of the game. There are many indications that 'Bush Knew'. It is not 'wacko speculation'.
______________
"We — and especially their families — have a right to know the truth. The commission has been asking some uncomfortable questions about what Washington knew, including the single most pressing one: Could the attacks somehow have been avoided or stopped?
No one knows exactly why George W. Bush seems so reluctant to let the truth come out. Had someone tried to warn him about an imminent attack? Were there embarrassing predictions in the daily presidential briefing? If Sept. 11 was truly a life-altering experience for the nation, shouldn't all of us know the cold, hard facts?"
_________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/