[lbo-talk] Re: Corporate Porn to Kids

[Max B. Sawicky]

It's not a danger; it's my fervent hope to forbid sex.
I'd say there's zero danger of this inducing any kind
of neurosis later.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "jeffrey fisher" <jfisher at igc.org>
To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Re: Corporate Porn to Kids


> how do you deal with the danger of making sex seem even more forbidden 
> than it already seems/is?
> 
> or do you think that's not an issue?
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, March 23, 2004, at 06:09 PM, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
> 
> > You're all out of your minds.
> >
> > No good can come of pre-teens experimenting with
> > sex, and that's exactly what MTV etc. encourage
> > them to do.  Little girls want to be grown up and
> > socially accepted, and boys want to put their
> > virgin weiners into anything that's warm.
> >
> > Nor is it smart for teens to indulge, given the
> > Irresponsibility of boys leading to the dangers
> > of pregnancy and disease.
> >
> > This is not 'prudery.'  It's basic to
> > caring for a child.
> >
> > Mbs
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
> 
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk