Why would Kerry find it worthwhile "to pursue the 'Zapatero' option" if liberals and leftists all said that they would vote for him _no matter what_ his policy on Iraq would be? To make Kerry even _consider_ the "Zapatero option," they must say that they will vote for Nader _unless_ Kerry pursues it.
B. docile_body at yahoo.com, Thu May 13 04:42:32 PDT 2004:
>Shane Mage wrote:
>
>"Was one of the signatures he did get yours? If not, why not? Were
>you afraid he'd throw Texas to Bush?"
>
>So, you're basically admitting Nader wouldn't have had a chance to
>win in Texas anyway?
Kerry has no chance of winning Texas and other Republican one-party states. Those who live in one-party states should all campaign for Nader, unless they want to aggravate abstention resulting from the miserable presidential choice offered by the Republican and Democratic Parties. -- Yoshie
* Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/> * Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/> * Calendars of Events in Columbus: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html>, <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/> * Student International Forum: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>