"Kerry has no chance of winning Texas and other Republican one-party states. Those who live in one-party states should all campaign for Nader, unless they want to aggravate abstention resulting from the miserable presidential choice offered by the Republican and Democratic Parties."
Oh, we should, eh? And why Nader and not some of the other even more radical 3rd party, socialist-type candidates? Nader's not on the ballot here [Texas], is suing tobe placed on it since he couldn't gete nough sigs--so how about the Socialist Party of Texas candidate, for example? I'd imagine his views would be even more agreeable than Nader's, even by your standards.
B