being Pat Buchanan."
he's pretty consistent...this doesn't seem any departure from his stance on issues...maybe some people just pick and choose, since his populism is, very often, close to the views of people who normally think him a demon...but they are of a pretty consistent political economic philosophy...
making sense is in the consciousness of the beholder?
fs, who sometimes agrees with buchanan..and stalin...and cox...and doug...and michael p.