Personally, I find you a committed 'dativist' - a dative 'case' - acted upon by data. I'm sorry that doesn't seem a warmer opinion. But look below. Even there you ask 'who's against it', looking for the data. A statist through.
Martin
On May 26, 2004, at 1:19 PM, Doug Henwood wrote:
> So being Leninist means being flexible and open? Who's against that,
> except maybe the parties that call themselves Leninist today? I still
> have no idea what it means to be a Leninist in 2004.