[lbo-talk] Where we stand today

[Michael Dawson]

Actually, R, Nate thinks freedom of speech is irrelevant here.  I was the
one asking him to please stop calling for censorship of ideas he doesn't
like.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
> On Behalf Of R
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 3:12 PM
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Where we stand today
> 
> At 02:57 PM 11/12/2004, you wrote:
> 
> >>Disprove his lies, but leave him his human rights, here, there, and
> >>everywhere.
> >
> >Human rights: Does this term have any meaning if it can be thrown around
> >in this context.  Concepts are like currencies one should be careful when
> >debasing them.
> >
> >Travis
> 
> we can all warm to Nathan "Landslide" Newman's generosity regarding
> other's
> human rights.  his willingness pay unsolicited lip service leaving us our
> human rights -- "here, there and everywhere" -- is reminiscent of the
> language of the Declaration of Independence, or at the very least the
> lyrics of a top 40 hit.
> 
> thanks, Landslide.
> 
> R
> 
> >___________________________________
> >http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> 
> 
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk