[lbo-talk] severe exit poll discrepancies

Gregory Geboski greg at mail.unionwebservices.com
Sun Nov 14 17:51:05 PST 2004


This can be debunked rather easily. I will summarize the basic argument as follows:

"This is just another internet conspiracy theory. A Cal Tech-MIT project under the direction of highly credible people like Charles Vest and David Baltimore has determined that all of these conspiracy theories can be restated in such a way so that an elegant if irrelevant analysis of data applied to its straw-man question will show that you're a stupid stupid person whom we laugh at! Hah hah! So shut up, you Steven Freeman you!"

I hope this clears things up.

---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:59:29 -0800


>Steven Freeman of the University of Pennsylvania concludes:
>
>"My purpose in this paper has not been to allege election theft, let
>alone explain it. Rather, I have tried to demonstrate that exit poll
>data is fundamentally sound, that the deviations between exit poll
>predictions and vote tallies in the three critical battleground
>states could not have occurred strictly by chance or random error,
>and that no solid explanations have yet been provided to explain the
>discrepancy. In short, I have tried to justify the discrepancy as a
>legitimate issue that warrants public attention."
>
> <http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/The_unexplained_exit_poll_discrepancy_v00k.pdf>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>

________________________________________________________________



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list