[lbo-talk] Catholic Bishops organizing against Kerry

C. G. Estabrook galliher at alexia.lis.uiuc.edu
Tue Oct 12 08:53:13 PDT 2004


Bishops like Chaput, whom the NYT picks out to profile, are the exception. The traditional RC position was expressed in a letter to the US bishops this summer by the pope's intellectual bodyguard, the notorious right-wing Vatican Cardinal Josef Ratzinger:

"...When a Catholic does not share a candidate's stand in favour of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons."

Given the Vatican's clear condemnation of the invasion of Iraq, inter alia, many informed Catholics, including bishops, have no trouble descrying "proportionate reasons." --CGE

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, DSR wrote:


> Per certain Catholic bishops, a vote for Kerry is committing a sin.
>
> Group of Bishops Using Influence to Oppose Kerry By DAVID D.
> KIRKPATRICK and LAURIE GOODSTEIN
> ENVER, Oct. 9 - For Archbishop Charles J. Chaput, the highest-ranking
> Roman Catholic prelate in Colorado, there is only one way for a
> faithful Catholic to vote in this presidential election, for President
> Bush and against Senator John Kerry.
>
> "The church says abortion is a foundational issue,'' the archbishop
> explained to a group of Catholic college students gathered in a sports
> bar here in this swing state on Friday night. He stopped short of
> telling them whom to vote for, but he reminded them of Mr. Kerry's
> support for abortion rights. And he pointed out the potential impact
> his re-election could have on Roe v. Wade.
>
> "Supreme Court cases can be overturned, right?" he asked.
>
> Archbishop Chaput, who has never explicitly endorsed a candidate, is
> part of a group of bishops intent on throwing the weight of the church
> into the elections.
>
> Galvanized by battles against same-sex marriage and stem cell research
> and alarmed at the prospect of a President Kerry - who is Catholic but
> supports abortion rights - these bishops and like-minded Catholic
> groups are blanketing churches with guides identifying abortion, gay
> marriage and the stem cell debate as among a handful of
> "non-negotiable issues."
>
> To the dismay of liberal Catholics and some other bishops, traditional
> church concerns about the death penalty or war are often not
> mentioned.
>
> Archbishop Chaput has discussed Catholic priorities in the election in
> 14 of his 28 columns in the free diocesan newspaper this year. His
> archdiocese has organized voter registration drives in more than 40 of
> the largest parishes in the state and sent voter guides to churches
> around the state. Many have committees to help turn out voters and are
> distributing applications for absentee ballots.
>
> In an interview in his residence here, Archbishop Chaput said a vote
> for a candidate like Mr. Kerry who supports abortion rights or
> embryonic stem cell research would be a sin that must be confessed
> before receiving Communion.
>
> "If you vote this way, are you cooperating in evil?" he asked. "And if
> you know you are cooperating in evil, should you go to confession? The
> answer is yes."
>
> Rest of article at:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/12/politics/campaign/12catholics.html?hp&ex=1097640000&en=1548d8d560c9b43f&ei=5094&partner=homepage
>
> ===== "If Jesus had been killed twenty years ago, Catholic school
> children would be wearing little electric chairs around their necks
> instead of crosses." - Lenny Bruce



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list