>But, whatever Doug claims about Nader, it doesn't stand or fall
>because he fails to make the same observation about Treeface.
Treeface is a servant of big capital. Nader evokes fantasies about the nonexistent beautiful old days of little capital, when things were allegedly competitive, as if competition were an unmitigated social plus. For self-identified Marxists not to express any problem with Nader's fantasizing about small capital is a little odd.
Doug