> Well intentioned, intelligent people
> differ in their moral beliefs; that's just a reflection of the
> profound complexity of social relations and social structure. I don't
> get why Brian ignores the ubiquity of moral disagreements.
>
> What's important, as Justin keeps emphasizing, is a good method
> for adjudicating between people with different moral beliefs and
> practical objectives.
On your premises, there's no basis for agreement about this either. Why would individuals valuing sadistic domination and exploitation of others, for instance, and having this as their practical objective also value "a good method for adjudicating between people with different moral beliefs and practical objectives"?
Ted