[lbo-talk] Sexual self-expression

ravi gadfly at exitleft.org
Tue Sep 21 08:54:16 PDT 2004


Michael Pugliese wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:49:22 -0700 (PDT), Chris Doss
> <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com> wrote:

>>--- andie nachgeborenen
>><andie_nachgeborenen at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>What I still want to know about anyone's condemnation
>>of the harmless sexual practices of consenting adults,
>>whatever they may be, is Who Asked You?
>>
>>So necrophilia is OK...
>
> Consent. Between adults. Live ones. How do you keep on missing the
> basic point?
>

actually, to take it further, what's the problem with necrophilia? surely the dead guy doesn't care. is it that its a disturbing issue for the relatives? what if i put it in my will that my body be available for sexual use by others, should they so desire? seems better than donating it to science ;-).


> And who here is defending incest or peadophilia?

and similarly for incest... what's the non-biological problem with it? it can meet the 'consenting adults' requirement.

--ravi



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list