> As for posts about yours truly, Daniel Davies once did a mock
> statistical analysis of a (now departed) list member's posts:
> <http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/2000/2000-January/000333.html>. Still very
> funny.
from Daniel's post>...
Hmmmm .... it's quite clear that this issue is never going to be resolved merely by all these arty types talking about the meaning of "stalking" and what have you. We need the firm objectivity of a trained econometrician, just like we do with beauty and art and stuff. So here we have:
Mr Davies' Bloody Awful Statistical Research ----------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT:
The aim of this study was to discover whether T Byfield had been stalking Yoshie Furuhashi. In this context, stalking is to be defined as the statistical significance of a "harassment function" including persistence and interrogativeness.
http://search.lbo-talk.org/search/swish.cgi?query=stalking+&submit=Search%21&metaname=swishdefault&sort=unixdate Results for stalking 1 to 15 of 130 results.
I hope you'll desist from cyber-stalking. -- Yoshie * http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/2003/2003-July/017654.html http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/2003/2003-July/017659.html
[lbo-talk] LBO-talk Fundrace [ Fri Jul 16 09:11:58 PDT 2004 rank= 950, size= 6145 bytes, author= Yoshie Furuhashi ] ... that came up through my searches were "John P Lacny, Researcher, 1199P/SEIU" (who has to be John Lacny of LBO-talk) who gave "Howard Dean" $250 ... -- Michael Pugliese, writing The Book of Ilk