uvj at vsnl.com wrote:
>Ref. "Heidegger's work is to be understood, according to Goldmann, as in large part a polemical response,'perhaps even unconscious', to Lukacs's book of 1923. The 'true' and 'false' consciouness discussed by Lukacs, became, presumably, the 'authentic' and 'inauthentic' existence in Heidegger; Lukacs's distinction between 'essence' and 'phenomenon' became Heidegger's distinction between 'ontic' and 'ontological', etc."(Ref. "From Bergson to Lukacs" in Colletti's, Marxism and Hegel)
>
Oh, from the little bit of Heidegger I have read, I would have thought
him more influenced by Buddhism/eastern philosophy.
Joanna
>
>