Oh,. and it was what you'd call an "extension" course, funded almost entirely by the federal government. You see, we weren't making a whole lot of money back then. Barely enough for "teamers and choneys" as one would say.<g>
Chuck0 wrote:
> Miles Jackson wrote:
>
>> This has puzzled me for years now: like Chris, I see no meaningful
>> distinction between a society genuinely based on Marxist principles
>> and an anarchist society. No state, activities and groups based
>> on mutual benefit and cooperation, no wage exploitation, no
>> "property rights"--how does this Marxist dream differ from Chuck's
>> anarchist utopia?
>
>
> Anarchism and Marxism have been divorced for over a hundred years now.
> There are plenty of articles and books out there on why anarchism and
> Marxism are different.
>
> Perhaps a good place to start is with the works of the libertarian
> Marxists and council communists. Why are these people closer to
> anarchism and farther from traditional Marxist leftism?
>
> A more direct answer to our questions involves the history of "Marxist"
> experiments such as the Soviet Union and China, and why anarchists focus
> so much on "practical" activities. We've seen what happens when
> so-called Marxists or Leninists seize the state to make it "wither
> away." On the other hand, anarchists maintain that you practice what you
> preach for starters. We do not have any fantasies about seizing the
> state and we prioritize implementing our ideas in our ongoing revolution.
>
> Chuck
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
--
Gary Williams
Prohibition Funds Terrorism ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.1/64 - Release Date: 04/08/2005