[lbo-talk] Defining Conservatism Down

Chip Berlet c.berlet at publiceye.org
Mon Aug 22 12:08:19 PDT 2005


Hi,

The answer is yes, that would make more sense, but the huge voting base of the Christian Right in alliance with the Neocons and militarists is trumping Wall Street right now. The Rockefeller Republicans are eclipsed.

-Chip Berlet

________________________________

From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org on behalf of Marvin Gandall Sent: Mon 8/22/2005 2:44 PM To: LBO-Talk Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Defining Conservatism Down

Jim Farmelant wrote:


> Big capital thus still needs parties like the Democrats
> in the US or New Labour in Great Britain to get portions
> of their neoliberal program enacted, precisely because
> the right cannot, on its own, mobilize popular support
> for such a program. Big capital needs the Democrats
> in the US or Labour in the UK to convince the general
> public that it's necessary to save the welfare state
> by destroying it.
----------------------------------- By this logic, shouldn't the capitalists have turned to Democratic and Labour politicians like Mondale, Dukakis, and Michael Foot as instruments of their post-70s offensive to privatize and deregulate the welfare state rather than to Republicans and Conservatives like Reagan and Thatcher? Shouldn't Wall Street have supported Kerry over Bush as the better bet to privatize social security and defend the tax cuts for the rich, as well as to push other items on the corporate legislative and regulatory agenda?

___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef Size: 4554 bytes Desc: not available URL: <../attachments/20050822/dfd76bbd/attachment.bin>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list