>One thing I will say, we must not become anti-science. It will only put us
>backward. So, you must have the power to discriminate, analyse to find what
>is good for us. We must not say, bio-technology is good or bio-technology is
>bad. There is nothing like that. Anything may be good or bad, depending on
>how you use it. That is when ethical considerations come in. I always said,
>you need three kinds of mechanisms -- bio-surveillance, bio-ethics and
>bio-safety. If you put all these mechanisms, you can use these technologies
>safely.
This seems extremely sensible & persuasive. So what do the Michael Perelman's of the world say?
Doug