>The only reason you are asking this question is because you haven't
>>bothered to look
>
>Chill out a bit.
>
>Doug
>Comment: why does simply pointing out that there is ample, abundant
>data about Cuba's strategies of development from different
>sources requires a "chill out" admonition and the posting of anti
>Cuban mainstream neo-lib dis-informative articles from Reuters
>doesn't?
Because I was reaccting to style, not content. You could point to the "ample, abundant data" without getting nasty or condescending about it.
Doug