>http://www.firstofthemonth.org/archives/2005/07/with_friends_li.html
>>...Navasky, though doesn't seem to recognize he's revealed the worst
>about some of his magazine's "best friends." His no regrets pose and
>narrow focus on process (legal and otherwise) make you wonder about
>his ethics. But this isn't personal. The deals at the heart of A
>Matter of Opinion are everyone's business. If you want to help stop
>the bleeding from the War on Terror you need to be on Navasky's case.
etc.
I'm with Big Vic's reaction, at the bottom of that page: "Okay, I've now read it a fourth time and even though I still have trouble understanding the basis of Benj's various indictments, I know they must be important."
Michael, why are you so obsessed with this shit?
Doug