Hilarious!
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: John Spritzler <spritzler at comcast.net> Date: Dec 4, 2005 6:59 PM Subject: [anti-allawi-group] The Chomsky vs. Dershowitz debate: both sides were awful! To: anti-allawi-group <anti-allawi-group at yahoogroups.com>
Dear Friends,
I just finished watching a TV broadcast of a Nov. 29, 2005 debate between Noam Chomsky and Alan Dershowitz at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and it makes me want to throw up!
Both celebrity speakers agreed 100% with the Ku Klux Klan idea of racial separation.
They both advocated a Jewish state, in which only Jews are the sovereign authority, and in which Jews are made a permanent majority by denying the right of return to millions of non-Jews. They both embrace the Klan idea that racial discrimination against non-Jews in a Jewish state is ok so long as the land where the non-Jews are sequestered is called a Palestinian state.
Neither man said that, in a region where Jews and non-Jews live on top of each other and on top of a single aquifer, there should be a single state based on equal rights for Jews and non-Jews. When a person in the audience "accused" Chomsky of wanting a single state solution he adamantly denied it!
Dershowitz defended Israel at one point by asserting that the obstacle to peace was the refusal of Palestinians to give up their right of return. Instead of defending the right of return and explaining how important it was for Palestinians, Chomsky lamely replied that it was an unimportant isssue.
Chomsky and Dershowitz argued passionately, but only about who was to blame for the failure to reach the Ku Klux Klan solution they both embraced.
No wonder Harvard University (whose President says that it is anti-semitic to oppose Israel) sponsored this so-called debate. Both sides were equally racist! A real debate would have somebody who agreed with Albert Einstein that there should not be a Jewish state in Palestine debate somebody (it could be either Dershowitz OR Chomsky) who would defend the racist idea of a Jewish state and racial separation in Palestine. As is well established (see http://newdemocracyworld.org/israel.htm ) Harvard will not sponsor a real debate because if it did Einstein's position would win.
I know some of you love Chomsky, and yes, he has contributed to unmasking many crimes of American leaders, but when it comes to debates like this the man actually HELPS Zionists like Dershowitz by making them look very reasonable. This debate was a huge defeat for equality and democracy in Palestine, and a real coup for the Zionists.
--John
The People As Enemy : The Leaders' Hidden Agenda in World War II (Hardcover) by John Spritzler About the Author John Spritzler holds a Doctor of Science degree in Biostatistics from the Harvard School of Public Health where he is employed as a Research Scientist engaged in AIDS clinical trials. Black Rose Books (May 15, 2003) Customers who bought this book also bought
* Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins
* Imperial Crusades: Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yugoslavia by Alexander Cockburn
* George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Griffin Tarpley
* Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire by Niall Ferguson
* 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA by Webster Griffin Tarpley http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1551642700/qid=1133750043/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-0685591-2389735?s=books&v=glance&n=283155
On the Public Agenda : Essays for Change by John Spritzler, David Stratman (Paperback - June 15, 2005) -- Michael Pugliese