Joanna
Michael Pugliese wrote:
> Hilarious!
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: John Spritzler <spritzler at comcast.net>
>Date: Dec 4, 2005 6:59 PM
>Subject: [anti-allawi-group] The Chomsky vs. Dershowitz debate: both
>sides were awful!
>To: anti-allawi-group <anti-allawi-group at yahoogroups.com>
>
>Dear Friends,
>
>I just finished watching a TV broadcast of a Nov. 29, 2005 debate
>between Noam Chomsky and Alan Dershowitz at the Harvard Kennedy School
>of Government, and it makes me want to throw up!
>
>Both celebrity speakers agreed 100% with the Ku Klux Klan idea of
>racial separation.
>
>They both advocated a Jewish state, in which only Jews are the
>sovereign authority, and in which Jews are made a permanent majority
>by denying the right of return to millions of non-Jews. They both
>embrace the Klan idea that racial discrimination against non-Jews in a
>Jewish state is ok so long as the land where the non-Jews are
>sequestered is called a Palestinian state.
>
>Neither man said that, in a region where Jews and non-Jews live on top
>of each other and on top of a single aquifer, there should be a single
>state based on equal rights for Jews and non-Jews. When a person in
>the audience "accused" Chomsky of wanting a single state solution he
>adamantly denied it!
>
>Dershowitz defended Israel at one point by asserting that the obstacle
>to peace was the refusal of Palestinians to give up their right of
>return. Instead of defending the right of return and explaining how
>important it was for Palestinians, Chomsky lamely replied that it was
>an unimportant isssue.
>
>Chomsky and Dershowitz argued passionately, but only about who was to
>blame for the failure to reach the Ku Klux Klan solution they both
>embraced.
>
>No wonder Harvard University (whose President says that it is
>anti-semitic to oppose Israel) sponsored this so-called debate. Both
>sides were equally racist! A real debate would have somebody who
>agreed with Albert Einstein that there should not be a Jewish state in
>Palestine debate somebody (it could be either Dershowitz OR Chomsky)
>who would defend the racist idea of a Jewish state and racial
>separation in Palestine. As is well established (see
>http://newdemocracyworld.org/israel.htm ) Harvard will not sponsor a
>real debate because if it did Einstein's position would win.
>
>I know some of you love Chomsky, and yes, he has contributed to
>unmasking many crimes of American leaders, but when it comes to
>debates like this the man actually HELPS Zionists like Dershowitz by
>making them look very reasonable. This debate was a huge defeat for
>equality and democracy in Palestine, and a real coup for the Zionists.
>
>--John
>
> The People As Enemy : The Leaders' Hidden Agenda in World War II (Hardcover)
>by John Spritzler
>About the Author
>John Spritzler holds a Doctor of Science degree in Biostatistics from
>the Harvard School of Public Health where he is employed as a Research
>Scientist engaged in AIDS clinical trials.
>Black Rose Books (May 15, 2003)
>Customers who bought this book also bought
>
> * Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins
> * Imperial Crusades: Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yugoslavia by Alexander Cockburn
> * George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography by Webster Griffin Tarpley
> * Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire by Niall Ferguson
> * 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA by Webster Griffin Tarpley
>http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1551642700/qid=1133750043/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-0685591-2389735?s=books&v=glance&n=283155
> On the Public Agenda : Essays for Change
>by John Spritzler, David Stratman (Paperback - June 15, 2005)
>--
>Michael Pugliese
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
>