[lbo-talk] Re: Chip Berlet on Hustler

Bill Bartlett billbartlett at dodo.com.au
Thu Dec 22 18:16:38 PST 2005


It seems dishonestly misleading to demand that someone "use another label than censorship" when that person hasn't used the "censorship" word in the first place. It implies that they actually said the thing you are asking them not to say anymore.

Here's a thought, why don't you actually read what people write before you comment on it?

Bill Bartlett Bracknell Tas

At 7:33 PM -0600 22/12/05, Carrol Cox wrote:


>Bitch | Lab wrote:
>>
>> At 06:04 PM 12/22/2005, Bill Bartlett wrote:
>> >At 1:46 PM -0500 22/12/05, Doug Henwood wrote:
>> >
>> >>I've watch various electronic forums spin totally out of control because
>> >>of a libertarian attitude towards assholes, or other disruptive sorts.
>> >>This is a moderated list, not a constitutional democracy.
>> >
>> >So this is the doctrine of pre-emptive execution then? The other danger is
>> >that people might be frightened to challenge the herd mentality and it
>> >will all get very boring and predictable.
>
>Ah, come off it. Lists are essentially private clubs with varying
>conditions for membership, in this case pretty open. Some years ago I
>kicked the Malecki character off the m-fem list (for a post on
>ball-breaking), & went away for the weekend. Malgosia was left tending
>shop & she kicked several more off for squawking that weekend. Good
>riddance. It's really asinine to complain about the parameters of any
>given list.
>
>Keep clear what censorship is: suppression of speech by the state. Other
>forms of suppression within given contexts may or may not be desirable,
>but use another label than censorhip.
>
>Carrol
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list