-----------
All that is well and good, and of course I agree. But I would advocate a more pro-active pursuit. Exactly how pro-active and in what direction depends on the particulars.
Let's go back and look at some recent rightwing Kulturmacht cases that I am familiar with: Bernal, Strauss, and now Churchill. These all have a common underlying theme of multiculturalism and racism, but from different perspectives. The Bernal case involved a denial of the roots of western history in ancient Egypt and Africa. Strauss as philosopher-hero, involves a different form of attack on multicultural roots mainly through Allen Bloom and the necons in power. And now the attack on Churchill---something I am just now thinking about.
What I've found in each of these cases is that further reading and interest in whatever the person or topic, carried out with a very jaundiced eye for Rightwing claims of truth, falsehood and `scholarship', has usually resulted in making a stronger case of support for the view attacked or in the case of Strauss, and even worse indictment of some presumed `good ideas'.
Sometimes it is a matter of ``concocting analyses far more thorough and accurate than mainstream'', getting the details straight and sometimes it means looking at the issue differently. It depends on the case.
Usually the Right goes after an individual they think is vulnerable to smear the more general idea or liberal consensus on a subject. Or in Strauss's case they support some hero they think is beyond reproach in order to promote some heinous ideology. Whatever.
I say, fine, let's go after the motherfuckers and find out.
They want to claim Africa and Egypt made no significant contribution to western civilization? They want to claim a hierarchical authoritarian state is our idea of democracy? They want to claim systematic extermination of Native Americans didn't happen? They want to claim 9/11 wasn't blow-back on Empire?
Come on people. These guys are fools. Let's trust our own thoughts and judgments better than that.
We can do more than just defend some individual under attack (with or without their warts). We can win these battles hands down and discredit the Right in the process.
History and culture is our terrain and we know it better than they do.
CG