>But don't worry, as far as I remember, Doug is one of those people
>who habitually ascribe motives to people, according to Carrol.
Yup that's me. It amazes me that a retired professor of literature would be so uninterested in motive; as I recall from when I used to read the stuff, exploring motives played a pretty big role in the texts themselves and in the interpretation of them. What *was* Satan up to in PL, Carrol?
Doug