Michael Dawson So, when you read Paul Craig Roberts and Paul Krugman, you do so without caring about their motives? Both those guys are putting out a lot of correct arguments these days. You don't wonder how and why?
^^^
CB: Yea, and another example, "_cui bono_? " is a valid question of arguments generally in social, political, economic and historical science and practice, even if it violates _ad hominem_. Aristotlean logic is only part of logic.