>Have you guys realized that, since I added "Greens for Nader:
><http://greensfornader.net/>" to my signature, all my postings with that
>signature show up in your search for postings containing the word "Nader,"
>including postings that said nothing about Nader within messages
>themselves? Cf.
><http://search.lbo-talk.org/search/swish.cgi?query=nader&metaname=swishdefault&sort=unixdate>
>:->
Doug's probably using Eudora's search tool which let's you seach by sender and by a specific phrase in the body, the subject line, to To: line, the headers, whatever. It can be case sensitive and it can search only for Nader, weeding out 'greensfornader'
As an e-mail archivist myself, I could do the same, and I love Eudora for this fab tool!
>I hope that, if not you and Doug who appear committed to denying _any_
>responsibility for the lose-lose-lose disaster in 2004, the rest of
>Americans on the (broadly defined) left are too disappointed, disgusted,
>or outraged by the John Kerry debacle to give as much support to the
>Democratic Party presidential candidate in 2008 as they did in 2004.
>--
>Yoshie
>
what are you talking about? how exactly am I involved in anything _substantive_ here other than to object to the way you portrayed Doug as pummelling nader and his supporters.
If you're going to characterize Doug that way, then expect it to be shoveled right back atchya!
kelley
"We live under the Confederacy. We're a podunk bunch of swaggering pious hicks."
--Bruce Sterling