On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Charles Brown wrote:
> CB: Do you subscribe to pragmatists' point as much as Nietzche's point ?
> Doesn't the pragmatists' point make Nietzche's point moot ?
>
I see quite a bit of conceptual overlap between pragmatism and N: genealogy of morals is a proto-pragmatist text, isn't it? In any case, the important thing about science is that it works. Whether or not it uncovers some neo-Platonic, immutable forms/laws is an idle philosophical question. (I think that qualifies as a pragmatic/Nietzschean point!)
Miles