Jeffrey Fisher wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:33:06 -0600, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
>
> that's not the way i read job, although perhaps i read job
> incorrectly. it's not a question of theodicy,
Take another look at the passage from Maritain. That's what he is
saying. I sort of construed Maritain as giving the Thomistic (or
neo-Thomistic) equivalent of Jeffrey's "he's f****ing god, after all.
why the
> > f*** does he *need* tact?" I.e., why does he need a theodicy?
Carrol