> Otherwise, you're an enemy of the human race. And an
> apologist for such conduct deserves no respect or
> consideration.
I just asked you what conclusion you drew from your observation. It would seem (given the cursory overview of the event that I've gleaned from your presentation) that an argument could be made for selective distribution of a finite food supply to 'friends' of the state rather than 'enemies' of the state, but I would not hazard that in the face of your conviction.
Martin